share
Super UserWhat part of a computer can you "skimp" on?
[+24] [16] Paolo Bergantino
[2009-07-15 08:14:41]
[ computer-building hardware-combination hardware-selection ]
[ http://superuser.com/questions/251] [DELETED]

So I'm thinking about building myself a new rig. I want to go for value more than anything, but I also want to get myself a nice enough setup that I can play the latest games considerably well. Last time I built a computer I skimped on the power supply and it bit me big time later on.

I know the ideal answer is "don't skimp on anything", but are there are any parts of a computer you can do relatively well without having a particularly "good" component?

[+26] [2009-07-15 08:27:40] jtimberman

Video card. Don't buy the latest and greatest most bleeding edge. Buy the card that was super awesome 3 months ago. You're probably not playing many games that are really going to stress most cards for at least a year anyway. For example, I bought an nVidia 8800GT when it was at the $200 price point (recently after release) despite it not being the OMGWTFBBQ fastest card available. While I'm not a bleeding-edge gamer anymore, I've had the card a year and it runs DoW2, Oblivion, NWN2, L4D and TF2 perfectly awesome at 1920x1200, 8xAA etc etc.

That said, I've been building PCs for myself for 15 years, and even had a job doing that for 3 years in college. PC parts generally have price points, and these values really haven't changed much. That is, they're just as accurate (in the ballpark) now as they were nearly 15 years ago. Here's the quick guide off the top of my head.

  • CPU, $200
  • Video card, $200
  • Motherboard, $100
  • RAM, $100
  • PSU, $100-200
  • Case, $50-100
  • Hard drive, $150
  • Optical drive, $30
  • Sound card - heh, built in ftw.

Every PC I've built has been $1000-1500. I'm an enthusiast PC gamer, but I don't buy the latest gear. I stick to roughly these price points, and end up with systems that will run the games I want to play (mostly FPS) for 3-4 years.


(2) Agreed, in the past I've bought a lot of video cards, but now I tend to only use my PC for development opposed to gaming, I'm happy to stick with on board graphics. Same goes for soundcards, I don't think I've bought one in about 7 years. - Sliff
@jtimberman: So you get each of the last 5 items every time? - Nikhil Chelliah
(1) Agreed, if you are not going to play the latest games (or use other graphically intensive applications) then you won't benefit from the extra money. You'll get 80% of the performance for 20% of the money. - Richard
(2) The OP said he wanted to play the latest games, so a video card is absolutely the last place to skimp on. - 17 of 26
"Skimping" on the video card in this case would save him about $200. - jtimberman
@Nikhil, I build whole new systems rather than upgrade individual components. I have an army of old computers in my basement to do my bidding. - jtimberman
(2) usually the best thing to skimp on is the video card. you get good performance at a fraction of the cost. - Josh Curren
1
[+23] [2009-07-15 08:19:44] jjnguy

First of all, don't skimp on you PSU. That is basically the most important part of a system.

When I buy systems, I skimp on the optical drive, and the processor.

As far as oprical drives go...you don't really need anything nice for every day gaming and use.

For CPUs I recommend looking for a lower end processor in a line of processors with faster clock cycles. You can usually overclock for a free performance boost.

*Other Notes* I recommend buying a fairly nice motherboard to begin with. That way, you have something you can grow into. You can always add more ram if you leave slots open, so I recommend buying big sticks. And, make sure your mobo has a new-ish chipset that will support new processors. Usually, nicer motherboards come with nice enough sound cards so you won't need one of those.


(8) +1 skimping on PSU is false economy even if it doesn't break and take your whole computer with it! - Stevo3000
(9) CPU, definitely. One of the easiest things to upgrade later unless you're on an end-of-life socket format. - Jeff Atwood
(5) although I disagree on "nice motherboard".. seen a lot of really expensive mobos that have features 90% of the people will never use. I go basic on mobo, as long as it has the few essential features I care about (2 video card slots, etc) - Jeff Atwood
(1) The reason I suggest nice mobo isn't for extra features. A nice mobo will have a newer chipset and will support more ram, and will, in general, be more extensible. - jjnguy
(8) I always find that by the time I want a new CPU they've changed the damn socket architecture and I need to buy a new motherboard anyway :). - 17 of 26
(1) @17 of 26 It sounds like you should be upgrading more often. - jjnguy
skimping on an optical drive? other than not getting blueray, how does one 'skimp' in that category? - warren
(1) I can't but agree: today more than ever. I've just find that my PSU was almost melted...and so my whole pc is unusable. So I'm suggesting to not even skimp on cooling system (sometimes it could be enough to have a bigger case) - dag729
2
[+13] [2009-07-15 08:20:33] random

Speakers - If you can stand playing with suboptimal sound. With a hi-fi around you could just hook those up to the machine provided you have the right jack support. Or just use some el cheapo earphones/headphones.


(2) Yes good headphones are better value than good speakers. For example budget sennheisers are relatively good. - Pacifika
(1) Decent speakers are very cheap though. I got a Creative Inspire 2400 (Today the T3200 seems the closest) for like 50 bucks a couple of years ago. Obviously they don't sound great but for that money, they are awesome. Normally cheap PC speakers make your ears hurt. Not these ones. So you can skimp on speakers, and you don't even have to play with a suboptimal sound. - Lennart Regebro
3
[+7] [2009-07-15 15:00:55] Jeffrey

Network card. You really don't need a Killer NIC M1 [1] for $250.

[1] http://www.bigfootnetworks.com/killer-nic-m1/

4
[+6] [2009-07-18 22:47:30] Lennart Regebro

Everything.

And nothing.

The same rule goes for everything: Don't buy the latest and greatest. Get last years stuff. It's 90% of the performance for 50% of the price compared to the latest toys.

There is one exception though: Anything with a fan. Get good, silent, brand fans. Other fans break down after a couple of months and start making horrid noises.


(2) +1 for fans! can't say how often i've had to kick my machine to get the fan to shutup :( - warren
5
[+5] [2009-07-15 08:29:20] ChrisF

It is easier to give reasons why you shouldn't skimp on certain components. For example:

  • Keyboard & mouse - the input devices for your computer. The mouse especially needs to be comfortable and a good fit for your hand.
  • Monitors - need to be as large/high resolution as possible as you're staring at them for long periods.

and so on.

One approach could be to look at what's easiest to upgrade. Another would be to look at components that aren't on the cutting edge. So you might go for last year's graphics card for example.


(2) Those three can stick around between rigs, though - ESPECIALLY keyboard and mouse, nothing throws me off more than my inputs being funky. - Phoshi
@ChrisF: That's a really good approach: subjective and thus more accurate. @Poshi: +1 for a nice point: some suckysh keyboard's behaviour just throw me off a couple of month ago - dag729
(1) @dag729 & @ChrisF: Personally I think a large size monitor isn't always a good thing–on my latest and greatest I often find myself looking several seconds for that pesky popup window or icon. - oKtosiTe
6
[+4] [2009-07-15 09:34:27] NickNameNick

A reliable computer needs a quality motherboard, a quality power-supply, and reasonable quality ram.

You don't need an expensive motherboard with extra slots for 'upgrading' that you will never get around to. Or a high end CPU that costs more than a new car (for a few weeks, anyway).

You certainly don't need the next big thing in graphics cards. a mid range card from last summers series will be playing the latest games quite happily for the next 3 years.

2 gigs of ram is plenty to start with, buy some reasonable quality stuff, but you needn't fuss about the latest or fastest. In 18-36 months time you're going to want to put more in, and that will mess up the electrical signals, preventing you from using the advanced timings and highest speeds anyway.

I'd spring for a decent mouse and keyboard, if you dont have them already, but they're easy to change, and not worth worrying about till you can sit down and play with a few to find out what you like. options are going to be discussed here ad infitum, see here [1]. they're easy to change later anyway.

Again, cant recommend skimping on a monitor, but at least they're easy to change, and a good one should last you a long time.

Buy a decent PSU, it touches as many or more components as the motherboard. get one with a brand name on it, that way the numbers on the sticker are more likely to be honest.

[1] http://superuser.com/questions/253/which-keyboard-would-you-recommend

I disagree on RAM now - maxing it out (to 4 or 8 GB) is really cheap, so why not start there? plus - then it's all timed together - warren
7
[+4] [2009-07-18 22:29:04] Pyrolistical

ram speed.

buy some cheapish (but not the cheapest) ram. you certainly don't need super fast timings.


8
[+4] [2009-07-18 22:36:11] Chris Thompson

No one has mentioned buying On-Board graphics. Nowadays, there are some really great on-board graphics cards. The AMD 780G and AMD790GX boards have great Radeon 3200/3300 chipsets, many with 128MB of dedicated video memory.

I build computers for under $500 using

  • AMD 780G/790GX ($70-90) board

  • AMD Athlon X2 Retail ($70)

  • 4GB RAM ($60)

  • 320GB hard drive ($50)

  • Case (get a $60 case with free shipping on Newegg for a great deal)

  • Total: $350 + shipping (newegg with free shipping saves a bundle)

Honestly, for basic computers I get a case with a built-in PSU. I've never had one die on me, but I only put them in regular (read: non-gamer) PCs. For my higher end PC I do have a namebrand PSU, but that'll add $50+ to your box.


This is certainly a good option for people who don't play games. The Radeon 3200/3300 chipsets are simply not in the same ballpark as even low end gaming cards. Fine for WoW, fine for solitaire, not really good for anything more modern. To be clear, if you don't care about playing games, you absolutely should go with a decent integrated graphics chip like specified above. - ChrisInEdmonton
(1) I play Guild Wars at 1600x1080 at 30fps with AAx2 on my Radeon 3300. - Chris Thompson
Yeap, perfect example. The Radeon 3200/3300 would be great for old games like this (Guild Wars was released more than four years ago), just not for more modern games like, say, Crysis. Though perhaps that's a bad example given how brutal it is for even current generation video cards. Let me be clear; Chris Thompson's points are right on the mark, I'm only stating that if you are looking at playing the latest AAA titles, on-board graphics won't cut it. But then, you probably aren't looking at spending $350 if these are the sorts of titles you want to play. - ChrisInEdmonton
9
[+3] [2009-11-05 19:58:21] David

Cables. Specifically, you do NOT need "Monster Brand" HDMI cables (those being the worst offenders I can think of).

You want cabling? Go to monoprice.com and save a bundle of money. I got FIVE 10' HDMI cables express shipped to me from Monoprice for less than HALF the cost of ONE six-foot cable.

Monster is the biggest ripoff in consumer electronics today.


10
[+3] [2009-07-15 09:48:55] kastermester

Well obviously we all have different understanding of what is needed.

First off - I would reuse every single thing you can from previous computers that does not "directly" (read hugely) influence performance - such as chassis, optical drives, chassis fans and so forth.

Next up - get yourself a good PSU (as you seem to have understood already, I too made that mistake once), a quality motherboard (quality doesn't mean it has to be the most expensive, but get one from a known brand with a known good chipset in it - the chipset means ALOT in the motherboard). The memory and CPU I'd "skimp" a bit on as well like others have suggested. That is, I'd go with a Duo/Quad Core CPU - try to get the newest product-line possible, but pay close attention to the prices. Say their clock speeds and prices are as follows

2.4GHz 100$
2.6GHz 110$
2.8GHz 170$
3.0GHz 300$

In this case I'd go for the 2.6GHz, simply because you pay only a little bit more compared with what you get - but once we go beyond this the price jumps become too much for me wanting to pay that much extra for a few extra Hz. IMO the product line of the CPU is often way more important than the model within the product line.

As far as memory goes, decide how much memory you want - and again, try to find the cheap sweet spot. Memory is cheap at the moment and it shouldn't be too hard to find cheap good memory - try go get some that is not running with the slowest timings you can find, or get some that is rated to run just slightly faster than you intend to run them at, so you can get slightly better timings - but there's no need to spend a large amount of money on memory.

If this is a rig for gaming - the graphics card is where you want to REALLY spend cash - it is for the most part the deciding factor in everything related to your gaming performance so go nuts here. If not, you can EASILY save a ton of money there as well.

A harddrive for gaming really only needs to be big - a faster harddrive will get you faster loading times, but for the main part - that's it. Get a normal 7200RPM drive and you'll be good. If you want a general faster computer elsewhere though, a good harddrive is a worthwhile investment too - maybe even considering a RAID setup (I gotta warn you about RAID 0 though - it sucks when the RAID breaks - but a RAID 10 if you can afford it, is really nice).

The last bits and pieces all comes down to what you can save from previous rig's. Do you have keyboard and mouse? Do you have a monitor? Do you have optical drives? Etc. Apart from optical drives - the rest of the parts left are the ones you'll physically interact with. As far as the performance of the computer, it doesn't really matter that much. But when we talk about interacting physically with the computer this is where the differences are made - so it all depends on how you want that to feel. Especially a bad chassis can really make assembling a computer a pain, but then again, you don't do that so often - the rest is pretty much up to you - whether you think it is worth the money or not, and of course, whether or not you can afford it.


i'd buy the 2.4GhZ CPU then overclock it - RCIX
11
[+2] [2009-07-15 08:29:56] Alistair Knock

For gaming, soundcard isn't too important (if you even buy one), neither is optical drive (so long as it works, I have still never comes across one that does for more than 3 months), and potentially the case so long as you choose one suitable for your cooling requirements. I would argue though that balance is the most important factor - minimising bottlenecks in an intermediate specced system can make it faster than a higher specced system which has say a hard drive bottleneck: make sure that your PSU can adequately cope with peak load, that your memory is fast enough to cope with an overclocked processor/FSB, and that your disks aren't slowing you down.


(2) Maybe the reason your optical drives only last three months as because you skimp on them ;) - Rowland Shaw
(2) 3 Months! What are you doing with them? I still own the first DVD-RW drive I brought around 5 years ago. Yeah it's a little slow at writing DVD's compared to recent ones but it still reads CDs at around 52x. - Simon P Stevens
They either just lock up completely and do nothing, or are excellent at reading/writing to one particular batch of CDR/DVDRs, and incapable of doing anything else. Like PCI modems and soundcards before them, my strategy is of complete denial of their existence, such that they can no longer cause me any grief. - Alistair Knock
12
[+2] [2009-07-15 08:27:09] user349

You don't have to buy the most expensive CPU or Graphics card to be able to play the best games.

You pay a premium to buy the most spectacular model of either but you can save a lot of money by buying the model down from that one with very little real life performance differences.


13
[+1] [2009-07-15 11:39:16] 17 of 26

If you want to play the latest games, then the video card is going to be your top priority - it's generally where you get the biggest bang for the buck in video game performance.

Generally speaking, when you build a PC you want to be buying hardware that's just below the bleeding edge level. As kastermester pointed out with CPU costs, there's a steep price curve from just below top of the line hardware to top of the line hardware. You'll notice this pattern in just about every PC component. Look at the top 3-4 offerings for a given piece of hardware and see where you get the most for your money.

Buying in this price range does a couple of things for you. First, you get the most out of the money that you're spending. Secondly, it maximizes the life you'll get out of your machine before you have to consider upgrading. It doesn't do you much good to skimp on something now if it means you're going to need to upgrade it in a year.

One thing you can skip out on though is a standalone sound card. Most motherboards have quality sound capabilities built in that pretty much eliminate the need for a separate sound card.

Hard drives and memory are so cheap now that you don't even need to skimp on them. The main areas you'll be cutting costs in is for the video card and processor, which fit the price curve I talked about earlier.


14
[+1] [2009-07-15 09:38:33] macbirdie

You can skimp on memory amount, you'll be just fine with 2GiB. You can buy more later. Don't however skimp on memory quality.

You can also skimp on the graphics card - a relatively recent mainstream graphics is enough for most of current games.

Optical drive is not a necessity, though if you buy a crappy one, it will die on you pretty fast. Just don't go the Blu-Ray route yet - it's too expensive for now.

You don't need a high-end CPU to play games - most of them need more GPU power than CPU.

Don't skimp on motherboard quality - it doesn't have to be a top-notch model, but if you buy a crappy quality one, condensers will blow up earlier than needed.

Having a super-silent-aluminium case is not necessary either.

A crappy monitor will either die fast, bad/hot pixels will pop up early, you'll notice blurring, display latency, strange pixel response-time compenstation artifacts, backlight leaking and unacceptable image quality.

Don't skimp on a keyboard, but you probably don't need to get any of those super-gamer-keyboards with LCDs and additional 128 macro buttons.

Mice are a gamble. I bought the Logitech MX620 Cordless Laser last year and it was great until left button's switch started failing, repeating button presses or failing to register them.

And yes, don't ever skimp on a PSU, although for a decent gaming system you won't need anything more powerful than 500 watts. You're not, after all, going for a high-end SLI GPU setup and an extreme 8-core CPU.


(2) Not sure 2 GiB is realistic for a modern computer running, say, Vista 64. Indeed, 2 GiB is the MINIMUM requirement for Windows 7 64-bit. Given that the price premium to go with 4 GiB instead of 2 is almost negligible, I'd certainly not recommend going with only 2. Disclaimer: The new computer I just bought was outfitted with 12 GiB, maybe I'm crazy. - ChrisInEdmonton
15
[-2] [2009-07-15 09:41:22] Charlie Somerville

You can definitely skimp on RAM, it's cheap as chips.

Don't spend more than $15 - $20 on a 1GB stick of DDR2.

If it busts, you can just get a new one on warranty, or if no warranty is available, it's not going to hurt your wallet much to buy a new one.


16